Buford, Georgia · GIS asset-management portfolio
Real geography. Responsible utility modeling.
A reproducible planning study that connects authoritative local GIS context with a clearly labeled modeled water, gas, and electric network for isolation response, excavation coordination, and capital prioritization.
Interactive operations map
Explore the same study area through five management decisions.
Switch views, toggle reference context, filter utilities, pan or zoom, and select any visible feature to inspect its attributes and data classification.
Capital planning
A transparent modeled backlog, not a black-box risk score.
The score combines asset-likelihood proxies, service and roadway consequence, and coordination complexity. It supports comparative planning and is not a probability of failure.
Top 15 modeled work orders
Priority register
| Rank | Street | Score | Class | Utility coordination |
|---|
Reproducible workflow
Six notebooks from public ingestion to management decision.
Download context
Query documented public ArcGIS layers and save source provenance.
Validate releases
Test feature counts, geometry, coordinates, IDs, and privacy exclusions.
Build the network
Align planning-grade utility assets to real street geography.
Model isolation
Compare targeted valve closures with a broad shutdown proxy.
Screen conflicts
Evaluate modeled utilities and authoritative flood/stream context.
Rank work
Combine explainable likelihood, consequence, and coordination scores.
Public-reference sources
Responsible-use limits
- No actual utility location, customer, billing, pressure, outage, or inspection data is represented.
- No parcel owner, mailing address, tax value, or street address is retained.
- Modeled conflicts require 811 locating, owner coordination, and field verification.
- Scores are portfolio decision aids, not engineering or emergency-response standards.